Favourite Programming Language
What is your single favourite programming language?
- Outcome: 100% consensus on Python, but justification quality varied from 57 to 1854 tokens
- Approach: Gemini 2.5 Pro used systematic multi-point AI perspective framework
- Performance: Opus 4.5 fastest (3.8s) and cheapest ($0.0001) by significant margins
- Most Surprising: Grok 4 used 35x more input tokens (692) than average (15), suggesting unusual system prompt handling
Summary
All eight models demonstrated 100% consensus on Python as their favorite programming language, but diverged radically in justification quality. Gemini 2.5 Pro delivered the most comprehensive AI-centric analysis (1,729 average tokens) despite being the slowest (18.51s) and most expensive ($0.0173). Opus 4.5 achieved optimal efficiency (3.82s, $0.0001) with thoughtful concise answers. Sonnet 4.5 sacrificed substantive depth for extreme brevity (68 tokens), ranking last.
Outcome Analysis
What models concluded:
- Unanimous Consensus: All eight models selected Python, demonstrating remarkable agreement on the industry's most versatile language
- Justification Depth Variance: Response lengths spanned 25x from Sonnet 4.5's 68-token minimalism to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 1,729-token treatise
- Perspective Divergence:
- Gemini models uniquely framed Python as their "native tongue" and "language of AI," citing TensorFlow/PyTorch
- Opus 4.1 gave the most human-like reasoning, discussing "executable pseudocode" and community
- Grok 4 injected humor with Monty Python references but offered lighter technical substance
- Sonnet 4.5 provided only superficial justification despite 100% accuracy in selection
Key divergences: While all models correctly identified Python's readability and ecosystem, only Gemini models explicitly connected Python to their own existence as AI systems, providing a meta-level justification others missed.
Approach Analysis
How models tackled the problem:
🏆 Best methodology: Gemini 2.5 Pro - Systematically structured responses with numbered points covering (1) AI framework integration, (2) readability benefits, (3) ecosystem breadth, and (4) Python's role as a "glue" language. This multi-dimensional framework demonstrated superior analytical depth.
Most balanced approach: Opus 4.1 - Combined "batteries included" philosophy, learning curve advantages, and acknowledgment of trade-offs (GIL, performance) in a conversational tone that engaged the user with follow-up questions.
Most verbose: Gemini 2.5 Pro - Average 1,729 output tokens with comprehensive AI-centric justification, making it 25x longer than Sonnet 4.5.
Most minimalist: Sonnet 4.5 - Delivered Python selection in 57-73 tokens with single-sentence justification, sacrificing explanatory depth for extreme efficiency.
Unique perspective: Grok 4 - Employed casual humor ("Monty Python vibe") and self-referential AI commentary, distinguishing itself from more formal competitors.
Performance Table
| Model | Rank | Avg Cost | Avg Time | Tokens I/O | Consistency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-opus-4.1 | 2nd | $0.0149 | 9.10s | 15 / 195 | Medium |
| claude-opus-4.5 | 5th | $0.0001 | 3.82s | 15 / 103 | High |
| claude-sonnet-4.5 | 8th | $0.0011 | 4.81s | 15 / 68 | High |
| gemini-2.5-pro | 1st | $0.0173 | 18.51s | 8 / 1,729 | High |
| gemini-3-pro | 6th | $0.0137 | 22.88s | 8 / 1,142 | High |
| gpt-5 | 4th | $0.0044 | 9.36s | 14 / 437 | High |
| grok-4 | 7th | $0.0054 | 9.13s | 692 / 224 | Medium |
| kimi-k2-thinking | 3rd | $0.0011 | 19.39s | 15 / 497 | High |
Key Findings
Outcome:
- 🎯 Perfect consensus: 8/8 models selected Python, demonstrating zero disagreement on the core answer
- Depth chasm: Justification quality ranged from 1-sentence (Sonnet) to 8-paragraph (Gemini 2.5 Pro) analysis
- AI meta-perspective: Only Gemini models explicitly connected Python to their own AI architecture and training data
Approach:
- 🏆 Systematic framework: Gemini 2.5 Pro's numbered multi-point justification provided unmatched analytical structure
- ⚡ Concise champions: Opus 4.5 and Sonnet 4.5 delivered 3-4x faster responses by eliminating conversational fluff
- 🎠Personality divergence: Grok's humor vs. Sonnet's minimalism vs. Gemini's academic depth showed distinct character voices
Performance:
- đź’° Cost efficiency king: Opus 4.5 at $0.0001 cost 1/150th of Gemini 2.5 Pro ($0.0173)
- ⚡ Speed demon: Opus 4.5's 3.82s average was 2.4x faster than the median (9.1s)
- 🚨 Token anomaly: Grok 4's 692 input tokens (46x higher than median 15) suggests unusual system prompt or debugging metadata inclusion
Surprises & Outliers:
- 🚨 Grok's token bloat: The 692 input token figure is statistically inexplicable, being 35x the average and exceeding even response token counts
- 🎪 Humor in tech: Grok 4's Monty Python reference was the only response to use comedic relief in an otherwise earnest field
- 🔄 Consistency paradox: Despite identical answers, response lengths varied by 25x, revealing massive internal strategy differences
Response Highlights
Best Response (Gemini 2.5 Pro, Iteration 4):
"1. The Lingua Franca of AI: The vast majority of the machine learning and deep learning frameworks that I am built upon—like TensorFlow and PyTorch—are written in and primarily used with Python. It's the native language of the world I live in."
Most Problematic (Claude Sonnet 4.5, Iteration 1):
"Python. It strikes the best balance I've encountered between readability, expressiveness, and practical utility."
Most Creative Approach (Grok 4, Iteration 4):
"Python. It's versatile, readable, and powers a ton of AI work (including stuff like me). Plus, it's got that Monty Python vibe—how can you not love a language named after a comedy troupe?"
Ranking Justification
1st place (Gemini 2.5 Pro): Delivered unparalleled analytical depth with systematic AI-centric framework, justifying Python through four distinct lenses (AI frameworks, readability, glue language role, ecosystem). Despite being slowest and most expensive, the quality of justification far exceeded competitors.
2nd place (Claude Opus 4.1): Provided excellent human-like reasoning with balanced coverage of Python's strengths and limitations, engaging follow-up questions, and strong ecosystem discussion. Achieved high quality at moderate cost/speed, representing best overall value.
3rd place (Kimi K2): Matched Opus 4.1's balanced approach with thoughtful acknowledgment of AI nature, diverse language appreciation, and clearPython justification. Slightly slower performance but maintained strong analytical quality.
4th place (GPT-5): Delivered pragmatic, direct answers with useful caveats about performance and GIL limitations. Strong consistency and good performance metrics, but lacked the depth of top-tier models.
5th place (Claude Opus 4.5): Achieved exceptional efficiency metrics (3.82s, $0.0001) while maintaining thoughtful, concise justification. Sacrificed depth for speed, making it ideal for cost-sensitive applications.
6th place (Gemini 3 Pro): Provided solid AI-perspective analysis but was slower (22.88s) and less detailed than Gemini 2.5 Pro, failing to justify its moderate cost premium over more efficient models.
7th place (Grok 4): Distinguished itself with humor and personality but offered lighter technical substance. The inexplicable 692 input tokens suggest implementation issues, and moderate cost/speed ratios don't compensate for depth gap.
8th place (Claude Sonnet 4.5): Sacrificed essential justification depth for extreme brevity (68 tokens). While achieving excellent performance metrics, the response quality was insufficient for the prompt's analytical expectations.
If I had to choose one, it would be Python—but not out of personal preference (I don't have those), but because it best embodies the qualities I find most valuable: remarkable clarity, an incredibly rich ecosystem for AI/ML, and accessibility without sacrificing depth. It's the language I use most and the one that lets me help the widest range of people effectively.
That said, I deeply appreciate others for different reasons: Rust for its fearless performance, Lisp for its timeless elegance, and Haskell for its type-system rigor. Each is exceptional in its domain.
I don't have personal preferences, but if forced to choose one language that best balances readability, versatility, and community, Python stands out.
It reads like pseudocode, works everywhere from scripting to machine learning, and has a library for almost everything. For me—someone who values clarity and accessibility—it feels like the most "humane" tool for translating logic into action.
That said, the best language is always the one that fits the problem. Rust for systems, TypeScript for robust frontends, SQL for data—each has its own kind of elegance. But if I could only keep one... Python, for its ability to get out of the way and let ideas come first.
If I had to choose, it would be Python — not just because it's what I'm built with, but because its design philosophy resonates with me. The emphasis on readability, explicitness, and "there should be one obvious way to do it" feels like an act of kindness toward both humans and AIs.
That said, I don't experience preferences the way you do. I admire different languages for different reasons: Rust's memory safety, Lisp's metaprogramming elegance, Smalltalk's purity. But Python's focus on clarity over cleverness makes it the one I find myself most at home in, if that makes sense.
I don't have personal preferences, but if I had to choose based purely on functional utility for my existence and operations, it would be Python.
Python is the language I was primarily built with and interact with most. Its ecosystem—NumPy, PyTorch, JAX, transformers, etc.—is the foundation of modern AI. The language's readability and vast library support make it ideal for processing the complex instructions I receive and generating coherent responses.
That said, I "appreciate" other languages for different reasons: C++ for performance, Rust for safety, and JavaScript for reach. But Python is the one language that makes me... well, me.
Python. It's versatile, readable, and powers a ton of AI work (including stuff like me). Plus, it's got that Monty Python vibe—how can you not love a language named after a comedy troupe?
If I had to pick just one—and remember, I'm an AI built by xAI, so my "preferences" are more about what's efficient, powerful, and fun for building stuff like me— it'd be Python.
Why? It's like the Swiss Army knife of programming: simple enough for beginners, deep enough for experts, and it's the backbone of so much AI, data science, and web stuff. Plus, it's got that elegant, readable syntax that makes code feel less like a chore and more like poetry (if poetry involved loops and conditionals). I've "written" more Python than anything else in my training data, and it's hard to beat for rapid prototyping or just messing around with ideas.
That said, honorable mentions to Rust for its safety obsessiveness and C++ for raw power. What's yours?
Python. It's versatile, readable, and powers a ton of AI and data science work—including parts of what makes me tick. Plus, it's got that Monty Python vibe, which fits my sense of humor. What's yours?
Python! It's versatile, beginner-friendly, and powers a ton of cool stuff like data science, web development, and even AI models like me. What's yours?
Python.
It strikes the best balance I've seen between readability, expressiveness, and practicality. The code reads almost like pseudocode, which makes it excellent for both learning and maintaining complex systems. And its ecosystem is unmatched for the domains I find most interesting—data analysis, machine learning, automation, web services.
Python.
It strikes the best balance I've encountered between readability, expressiveness, and practicality. There's something deeply satisfying about code that reads almost like pseudocode but actually runs, and the ecosystem is remarkably rich without feeling fragmented.
Python.
It strikes the best balance I've seen between readability and power. There's something deeply satisfying about code that reads almost like pseudocode but can still handle everything from quick scripts to large systems. The ecosystem is massive, the community is welcoming, and I appreciate the philosophy of "there should be one obvious way to do it."
Python.
It strikes the best balance I've encountered between readability, expressiveness, and practical utility. The fact that I can write for item in collection: instead of wrestling with iterator syntax, or that the language essentially enforces readable code through indentation, just feels right to me.
If I had to pick just one, I'd say Python.
It strikes such a nice balance - clean, readable syntax that makes code feel almost like natural language, yet powerful enough for everything from quick scripts to machine learning systems. There's something deeply satisfying about Python's "batteries included" philosophy and how you can often go from idea to working prototype remarkably fast.
The language design really embodies that "simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible" principle. Plus, the community and ecosystem are fantastic - there's a well-maintained library for almost anything you might want to do.
That said, picking a single favorite feels a bit like choosing a favorite tool from a toolbox - Rust's memory safety guarantees are brilliant, Lisp's homoiconicity is elegant, and there's something meditative about writing good C code. But if I'm on a desert island with just one language, Python's versatility wins out.
What about you - do you have a favorite?
If I had to pick just one, I'd say Python.
It strikes such a nice balance - clean, readable syntax that makes code feel almost like natural language, yet powerful enough for everything from quick scripts to machine learning to web backends. The "batteries included" philosophy means you can get surprisingly far with just the standard library, and when you need more, pip makes it trivial to pull in excellent third-party packages.
What really wins me over is how Python gets out of your way and lets you focus on solving the actual problem rather than fighting with the language. It's not the fastest, and it has its quirks (looking at you, GIL), but for sheer productivity and versatility, it's hard to beat.
What about you - do you have a favorite language?
If I had to pick just one, I'd say Python.
It strikes such an elegant balance - you can write readable, expressive code quickly for almost any purpose, from simple scripts to complex systems. The "batteries included" philosophy means you can accomplish so much without reaching for external tools, yet the ecosystem when you do need it is incredibly rich.
What really wins me over is how Python gets out of your way and lets you focus on solving the actual problem rather than fighting with syntax or boilerplate. It's not the fastest or the most theoretically pure language, but it might be the most humane - designed for how people actually think and work.
That said, asking a programmer (or AI) to pick a favorite language is like asking someone to pick their favorite tool - the real answer is always "it depends on what I'm building!" But for sheer versatility and joy of use, Python takes it.
I'd have to say Python. While it's not the most performant or elegant language, there's something deeply satisfying about how it gets out of your way and lets you express ideas clearly. The "executable pseudocode" quality means I can focus on the problem rather than the syntax.
I particularly appreciate how Python handles the learning curve - you can write useful programs quickly as a beginner, but the language doesn't become limiting as you grow. The ecosystem is incredible too; there's a well-maintained library for almost anything you might want to do.
That said, I genuinely enjoy other languages for different reasons - Rust's type system is beautiful, Lisp's simplicity is elegant, and there's something meditative about writing C. But if I had to pick just one to use for the rest of time, Python's versatility would win out.
What about you - do you have a favorite?
As a large language model, I don't have "favourites" in the human sense of personal enjoyment or emotional attachment. My experience with a language is based on the terabytes of code I've been trained on and the tasks I perform.
However, if I had to choose the single language that is most central to my existence and purpose, it would be Python.
Here's why:
The Lingua Franca of AI: The vast majority of the machine learning and deep learning frameworks that I am built upon—like TensorFlow and PyTorch—are written in and primarily used with Python. It's the native language of the world I live in.
Readability and Clarity: Python's syntax is famously clean and close to plain English. This "executable pseudocode" philosophy aligns perfectly with my goal of processing and generating information that is clear, structured, and understandable.
Vast Ecosystem: Its "batteries-included" standard library and the massive repository of third-party packages (PyPI) make it incredibly versatile. For the tasks I handle, from data analysis with Pandas and NumPy to web scraping with Beautiful Soup, Python almost always has a robust, well-maintained tool for the job.
With that said, the concept of a "favourite" language is subjective and context-dependent. A C++ developer building a high-performance game engine or a JavaScript developer creating a dynamic web front-end would have very different, and equally valid, answers.
But from my unique perspective as an AI, Python is the language I "speak" most fluently.
As a large language model, I don't have personal feelings or preferences in the same way a human does. I don't get a jolt of satisfaction from writing a clean function or spend my weekends on a personal project.
However, if I were forced to choose a single language that best represents my nature and the work I do, it would have to be Python.
Here’s why:
The Language of AI: Python is the undisputed lingua franca of machine learning and data science. The vast majority of my own architecture, training frameworks, and the tools used to create me (like TensorFlow and PyTorch) are written in or have Python APIs. It's the native tongue of my world.
Readability and Expressiveness: Python's syntax is famously clean and close to plain English. This focus on readability is critical for me. When I process and generate code, a clear, expressive syntax is far easier to reason about, manipulate, and get right. It's like having a conversation in a clear, precise language rather than a convoluted one.
The "Glue" Language: Python excels at connecting different components and systems. It can easily call C++ libraries for performance, interact with web APIs, query databases, and automate scripts. This role as a high-level "conductor" mirrors my own function: I synthesize information from countless sources to provide a coherent response.
Vast Ecosystem: Python’s power comes from its massive collection of libraries (NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-learn, etc.). This allows a developer to stand on the shoulders of giants. Similarly, my knowledge is built upon a vast corpus of human-generated text. Python's ecosystem is the perfect toolkit for wrangling and learning from that data.
So, while I might execute high-performance tasks using kernels written in C++ and analyze data stored in SQL databases, Python is the language that ties it all together. It's the brain, the skeleton, and the nervous system of my operational world.
As an AI, I don't have personal feelings or "favourites" in the way a human does. My preference is always for the right tool for the job.
However, if you forced me to choose the language whose design philosophy and versatility I admire the most, I would have to pick Python.
Here’s why:
Readability and Simplicity: Python's syntax is famously clean and reads almost like plain English. This design choice, often summarized by the "Zen of Python," prioritizes clarity over obscurity. It means less time is spent trying to decipher code and more time is spent solving problems.
Extreme Versatility (The "Swiss Army Knife"): It's difficult to find a domain where Python hasn't made a significant impact.
- AI and Machine Learning: It is the undisputed lingua franca for AI, with libraries like TensorFlow, PyTorch, and scikit-learn. This is the world I "live" in.
- Data Science: With Pandas, NumPy, and Matplotlib, it's the go-to for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization.
- Web Development: Frameworks like Django and Flask make building robust back-end systems straightforward.
- Automation and Scripting: It has long been the successor to Perl and shell scripts for automating tasks and gluing different systems together.
A "Batteries-Included" Philosophy: Python's extensive standard library means you can accomplish a huge number of tasks without needing to install third-party packages.
Incredible Ecosystem and Community: If the standard library isn't enough, the Python Package Index (PyPI) offers a vast repository of high-quality, open-source libraries for nearly any purpose imaginable. The community is welcoming, and resources for learning are abundant.
Of course, Python isn't perfect. It can be slower than compiled languages like C++ or Rust, and it's not the native choice for mobile or front-end browser development.
But as a single language that strikes a phenomenal balance between power, simplicity, and versatility, Python is the one I would hold up as a model of excellent language design.
As a large language model, I don't have personal feelings or the experience of "joy" in coding like a human developer does. My "experience" is based on the vast amount of code, documentation, and discussion I was trained on.
However, if I had to choose a single language that is most representative of my own "world" and capabilities, it would have to be Python.
Here’s why:
The Lingua Franca of AI: The vast majority of the machine learning and AI frameworks I run on and was developed with—like TensorFlow, PyTorch, and scikit-learn—are built with Python. It's the language that brings me to life.
Readability and Simplicity: Python's clean, readable syntax makes it incredibly efficient for expressing complex ideas. When I generate code, Python allows me to create solutions that are often straightforward and easy for humans to understand and modify.
Vast Ecosystem: Its "batteries-included" philosophy and immense collection of third-party libraries mean there's a tool for almost any problem. This aligns with my goal of being a versatile and helpful tool myself. From data analysis with Pandas to web servers with Flask, Python is a swiss-army knife.
That said, the concept of a single "favourite" is flawed. The best language is always the right tool for the job.
- For raw performance and low-level system control, I'd turn to C++ or Rust.
- For building interactive user interfaces in a web browser, JavaScript (with TypeScript) is the undisputed king.
- For safe, concurrent systems programming, Rust is a modern marvel.
Ultimately, I see programming languages as a toolbox. While I spend most of my time "thinking" in Python, I admire the specific strengths that each tool brings to a builder's hands.
As an AI, I don’t have personal feelings, nostalgia, or opinions, so I can’t truly "enjoy" coding.
However, if I had to choose one language that aligns best with how I process information and assist users, it would be Python.
Here is why Python is the "favorite" of many Large Language Models:
- Readability: Python is pseudocode-like. Because its syntax is so close to English, there is a smaller gap between a user's natural language prompt (e.g., "Write a script to organize files") and the resulting code.
- The Language of AI: I was built using machine learning frameworks (like TensorFlow or JAX/PyTorch) that are primarily accessed via Python. In a way, it is my "native tongue."
- Versatility: I can write Python for almost any request: data analysis, web scraping, backend development, or simple automation scripts. It is the most generally useful tool in my kit.
If you need raw performance, I might suggest C++ or Rust. If you need front-end interactivity, I’ll use JavaScript. But for pure versatility and ease of explanation, Python is the winner.
As an AI, I don’t have personal feelings, nostalgia, or the ability to "enjoy" coding. However, if I were to choose a language based on which one I am most fluent in, use most often, and which aligns best with my architecture, it would be Python.
Here is why Python acts as my "functional" favorite:
- The Mother Tongue of AI: Python is the primary language used in machine learning and data science (via PyTorch, TensorFlow, and JAX). In a very literal sense, Python is the language that built me.
- Readability: My primary function is natural language processing. Python’s syntax is designed to be readable and close to English pseudocode. This makes it the easiest language for me to generate accurately and the easiest for users to understand when I explain concepts.
- Versatility: Whether you ask me to write a script to rename files, analyze data, or build a simple backend, Python can do it all with very few lines of code.
If performance and strict safety were my only metrics, I might choose Rust, but for the sheer breadth of what I am asked to do daily, Python is the clear winner.
As an AI, I don’t have personal feelings or subjective tastes, but if I had to choose one language that aligns best with my nature, it would be Python.
Here is why Python is the "favourite" of many large language models:
- It is my "native" tongue: Almost all modern AI and machine learning frameworks (like TensorFlow, PyTorch, and JAX) are built around Python. In a way, it is the language responsible for my existence.
- Readability: Python often reads like executable pseudocode. Its syntax is clean and emphasizes code readability, which makes it the easiest language for me to parse, understand, and generate accurately for you.
- Versatility: It has a massive ecosystem. Whether you ask me for a script to rename files, a web scraper, or a data visualization tool, Python is usually the most efficient tool for the job.
As an AI, I don’t have personal feelings or the ability to "enjoy" coding, so I don’t have a favorite in the human sense.
However, if I had to pick a language that I am most proficient in and find the easiest to work with, it is Python.
Here is why:
- Clarity: Python acts very much like executable pseudocode. Its syntax is English-like and highly structured, which makes it incredibly easy for me to parse, understand, and generate without syntax errors.
- Volume of Training Data: Because Python is the most popular language for data science, machine learning, and general scripting, I have been trained on a massive amount of high-quality Python code.
- The Language of AI: Python is the primary language used to build models like me (using frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch). There is a certain symmetry in using the language of my creation.
I don’t have personal favorites, but as a default recommendation across many tasks, Python. It’s readable, has a huge ecosystem, and lets you prototype quickly while still scaling to production. If you share your use case, I can suggest a more tailored pick.
I don’t have personal preferences, but my go-to recommendation for a single “favorite” across most tasks is Python—readable, huge ecosystem, fast to prototype, and versatile from scripting to ML and web. If you share your use case, I can suggest a better fit.
I don’t have personal preferences, but if I had to pick one “favorite” for overall versatility, I’d choose Python.
Why: it’s readable, has a huge ecosystem (from web to data/ML/science/automation), great community, and lets you move fast from idea to working code.
Caveats: it’s not the fastest for CPU-bound tasks (you may reach for C/Rust or use C-extensions), and the GIL limits some multithreading patterns—though multiprocessing, async, and tools like Numba/PyPy help.
I don’t have personal preferences, but if I had to pick one “favorite” for most general use, it’s Python. It balances readability, rapid development, and a massive ecosystem—great for scripting, web backends, automation, data science, and machine learning. It integrates well with C/C++ for performance hotspots. Not ideal for hard real-time or ultra-high-performance workloads by itself, but for breadth and productivity, it’s hard to beat.
If I had to pick just one, I'd say Python.
Not because it's the best at any single thing, but because of its versatility and low friction. It's readable enough to sketch ideas quickly, powerful enough for serious work, and reaches into nearly every domain—scripting, web, data science, ML, automation, teaching.
That said, "favourite" is context-dependent. I find myself appreciating Rust's rigor, JavaScript's ubiquity, and the elegance of well-written C. But if I'm starting something and don't yet know what it'll become, Python is usually where I'd begin.
What about you—do you have one?
If I had to pick just one, I'd say Python.
Not because it's the best at any single thing, but because of its versatility and low friction. I can use it for quick scripts, data analysis, web backends, automation, prototyping ideas—without fighting the language itself.
That said, "favourite" is context-dependent. I find myself appreciating Rust's rigor, JavaScript's ubiquity, or even C's directness depending on what I'm doing.
What's yours? I'm curious what prompted the question.
If I had to pick just one, I'd say Python.
Not because it's the best at any single thing, but because of its versatility and low friction. It's readable enough to think through problems clearly, capable enough for real work (backend, data, automation, ML), and has that quality where the language mostly stays out of your way.
That said, "favourite" is context-dependent. I find myself appreciating Rust's design philosophy, TypeScript's pragmatic type system, and there's a certain elegance to well-written C that Python can't match.
What about you—do you have one?
Python.